2021年教师资格证冲刺模拟题卷一《高中英语》(5)

报名入口来源:中国教育在线 2021-03-04

单选题

2021年教师资格证冲刺模拟题卷一《高中英语》(5)

2021年上半年教师资格证笔试考试时间在3月13日,准考证打印时间3月8日-3月13日。考点在教师资格证上的准考证有标注,所以大家下载准考证后,一定要认真查看。今天小编整理了2021年教师资格证《高中英语》冲刺模拟题,来帮助大家复习。

教师资格证报名入口

21、请阅读Passage 1,完成第21-25小题。

Passage 1

The first time I questioned the conventional wisdom on the nature of a healthy diet, I was in my salad days, almost 40 years ago, and the subject was salt. Researchers were claiming that salt supplementation was unnecessary after strenuous exercise, and this advice was being passed on by health reporters. Al I knew was that I had played high school footbal in suburban Maryland, sweating profusely through double sessions in the swamp-like 90-degree days of August. Without salt pils, I couldn´t make it through a two-hour practice; I couldn´t walk across the parking lot afterward without cramping.

While sports nutritionists have since come around to recommend that we should indeed replenish salt when we sweat it out in physical activity, the message that we should avoid salt at al other times remains strong. Salt consumption is said to raise blood pressure, cause hypertension and increase the risk of premature death. This is why the Department of Agriculture´s dietary guidelines stil consider salt Public Enemy No.1,coming before fats, sugars and alcohol. It´s why the director of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention has suggested that reducing salt consumption is as critical to long-term health as quitting cigarettes.

And yet, this eat-less-salt argument has been surprisingly controversial--and difficult to defend. Not because the food industry opposes it, but because the actual evidence to support it has always been so weak.

When I spent the better part of a year researching the state of the salt science back in 1998--already a quarter century into the eat- less-salt recommendations--journal editors and public health administrators were stil remarkably candid in their assessment of how flimsy the evidence was implicating salt as the cause of hypertension.

While ,back then, the evidence merely failed to demonstrate that salt was harmful, the evidence fromstudies publishes over the past two years actualy suggests that restricting how much salt we eat can increase our likelihood of dying prematurely. Put simply, the possibility has been raised that if we were to eat as little salt as the U. S.D.A. and theC.D.C. recommend, we´d be harming rather than helping ourselves.

Why have we been told that salt is so deadly? Wel, the advice has always sounded reasonable. It has what nutritionists like to cal "biological plausibility. "Eat more salt and your body retains water to maintain a stable concentration of sodium in your blood. This is why eating salty food tends to make us thirsty:we drink more;we retain water. The result can be a temporary increase in blood pressure, which wil persist until our kidneys eliminate both salt and water.

The scientific question is whether this temporary phenomenon translates to chronic problems:if we eat too much salt for years, does it raise our blood pressure, cause hypertension, then strokes, and then kil us prematurely? It makes sense, but it´s only a hypothesis. The reason scientists do experiments is to find out if hypotheses are true.

The N. I. H. has spent enormous sums of money on studies to test the hypothesis, and those studies have singularly failed to make the evidence any more conclusive.

With nearly everyone focused on the supposed benefits of salt restriction, little research was done to look at the potential dangers. But four years ago, Italian researchers began publishing the results froma series of clinical trials, al of which reported that, among patients with heart failure, reducing salt consumption increased the risk of death.

21.Salt pils seemto be a kind of substance which .

A. improves one's performance in sports competition

B. provides one with necessary salt supplementation

C.prevents one frombeing addicted to salt

D.prevents one frombeing addicted to salt

22、According to the passage, when were people recommended to eat less salt?

A.Around the early 1990s.

B.Around the early 1990s.

C.Around the early 1970s.

D. Around the early 1960s.

23、According to the author, eating more salt .

A. has short termeffect upon people's blood pressure

B. has long termeffect upon people's blood pressure

C.has negative effect upon people's health

D.has no effect upon people's health

24、What the passage tries to tel the reader is that .

A.food industry misled people about salt consumption

B.strict salt consumption is necessary for people's health

C. salt consumption has no direct impact upon people's health

D. the suggestion of strict salt consumption might be misleading

25、It can be inferred that the author is .

A.supportive of the eat-less-salt campaign

B.suspicious of the eat-less-salt argument

C. sarcastic of the eat-less-salt argument

D. neutral of the eat-less-salt argument

点击查看答案21、参考答案:B 参考解析:推理判断题。第一段提到,作者在少不更事时就第一次对研究人员所声称的“大量运动之后不需要补充盐分”产生了质疑,由此可知salt pills是能补充盐分的。 22、参考答案:C 参考解析:细节理解题。根据第四段第一句的1998和a quarter century into the eat-less-salt recommendations可知,在1973年前后人们就被建议少吃盐。 23、参考答案:A 参考解析:推理判断题。第六、七段分别提到了多吃盐对人体造成的短期和长期影响,其中所谓的长期影响是建立在一种假 设之上的,而这种假设还有待求证。A项符合文章意思。 24、参考答案:D 参考解析:主旨大意题。文章针对传统的要少吃盐的论点展开论述,最后得出多吃盐会对人体造成危害的论点是建立在一个 假设之上的,而这个假设并不让人信服。因而选项D是正确的。 25、参考答案:B 参考解析:观点态度题。传统观点提倡除了剧烈运动外要少吃盐,而最后一段却提到,意大利研究人员发现,有心脏病的病 人减少盐摄入的话反而会增加死亡风险。因此作者对传统的少吃盐的论断是持怀疑态度的。
你可能感兴趣的试题
中国教育在线教师资格证频道为广大考生提供《地理学科知识与能力(初中)》模拟试题总汇等相关资讯。
中国教育在线教师资格证频道为广大考生提供 《政治学科知识与能力(初中)》模拟试题总汇等相关资讯。
中国教育在线教师资格证频道为广大考生提供《历史学科知识与能力(初中)》模拟试题总汇等相关资讯。
中国教育在线教师资格证频道为广大考生提供 《语文学科知识与能力(初中)》模拟试题总汇等相关资讯。
中国教育在线教师资格证频道为广大考生提供《数学学科知识与能力(初中)》模拟试题总汇等相关资讯。
我的题库在线题库
近期直播
联系方式

预报名

咨询

课程

题库